You are here
Outcomes of the consultation on the draft list of permitted indications
The permitted indication reform has now been launched. Please see Permitted Indications now available for use in Listed Medicines for more information.
On 6 March 2018, the TGA implemented a list of permitted indications for medicines listed under Section 26A of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act).
Indications available for use for listed medicines are now contained in a 'list of permitted indications' which is contained in the Therapeutic Goods (Permissible Indications) Determination. The list can also be accessed via the TGA Business Services website
For more information see Permitted Indications now available for use in Listed Medicines and Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance.
Development and consultation on the list of permitted indications
Extensive consultation was undertaken on the draft list of permitted indications.
- In February 2017 a public consultation paper, Consultation: Reforms to the regulatory framework for complementary medicines: Assessment pathways was released detailing proposed criteria and implementation options for the permitted indications reform. Submissions received and TGA responses are published on the TGA website.
- An initial draft list of permitted indications was developed based on industry submissions to previous TGA consultations and refined following several targeted stakeholder consultation forums in 2017.
- In July 2017, draft lists of permitted indications and indication qualifiers were published on the TGA website for a 3 month public comment period, which closed 31 October 2017. At the end of the 3 month comment period, 110 submissions were received, consisting of 11 consumer group submissions and 99 industry submissions.
- From these submissions a number of issues were raised by stakeholders and a large number of additional indications were proposed for inclusion in the list of permitted indications. A summary of industry comments and the TGA's consideration of these issues are provided below.
- In finalising the list of permitted indications, advice was sought from internal and external experts, including the Advisory Committee on Complementary Medicines (ACCM).
A summary of the issues raised by stakeholders during the open comment period on the draft list of permitted indications and TGA response is provided below. For information on TGA consideration of specific indications please see Additional indications proposed by industry during the 2017 public comment period.
Issue 1: Indications referring to restricted representations for vitamin D, calcium and folic acid
Industry stakeholders submitted that indications covered by the existing advertising exemptions for substance based restricted representations for vitamin D and calcium (referring to osteoporosis) and folic acid (referring to neural tube defects) have a safe history of use and an established evidence base and should be included in the list of permitted indications.
The TGA agreed that indications linked to vitamin D, calcium and folic acid have a safe history of use and established evidence base. Indications covered by the existing substance based restricted representations for these ingredients are included in the list of permitted indications. In order to be used in listed medicines, sponsors must continue to comply with the requirements for the current advertising exemptions.
Issue 2: Biomarker indications
Industry stakeholders submitted that indications making biomarker claims (i.e. referring to maintenance of blood glucose or cholesterol levels) are low risk and do not refer to or imply a health benefit for serious conditions. It was requested that all current 'standard indications' referring to biomarkers be included in the list of permitted indications.
Industry suggested that a mandatory label warning (for example, 'not for treatment of high cholesterol') would mitigate any potential risks posed by products using biomarker indications.
The TGA sought advice from ACCM on the appropriate risk stratification for biomarker indications. ACCM advised that indications referring to maintenance, management or control of biomarker levels, ratios and ranges should not be included in the permitted indications list. The TGA accepted this advice.
The new assessed listed medicines pathway and the registered pathway are options to enable sponsors to make higher-level indications (such as biomarker claims) than are allowable under the standard listing pathway.
Issue 3: Indications for pregnancy and foetal development
Industry stakeholders submitted that foetuses should be available as a target population qualifier to enable indications for foetal growth and development.
Industry stakeholders also submitted that the proposed label advisory statement, 'Not to be taken in first trimester of pregnancy unless under medical advice', will cause undue alarm for pregnant women.
The TGA sought advice from ACCM on the inclusion of indications for pregnancy and foetal development. ACCM advised that foetuses are a potentially vulnerable population group. Allowing a 'foetus' population qualifier to be available for selection for any permitted indication, without any mitigation measures, is not commensurate with the low risk nature of listed medicines. The TGA has accepted ACCM's advice and a 'foetus' target population qualifier is not available. However, a number of specific indications for this population group are included in the list, such as, 'Maintains/ support healthy foetal development'.
Industry concerns about the wording of the advisory statement for indications referring to pregnancy were acknowledged and the statement, 'Not to be taken in first trimester of pregnancy unless under medical advice' has been amended to: 'Advise your doctor of any medicine you take during pregnancy, particularly in your first trimester'.
Issue 4: Indications for medically diagnosed conditions
Industry stakeholders submitted that indications referring to the following 'medically diagnosed' conditions should be included in the permitted indications list:
- Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
- Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
For a limited number of conditions, it may be appropriate for a consumer to self-manage and assess the symptoms of their condition after an initial diagnosis has been made by a medical practitioner (where other diseases and conditions have been ruled out). For example: 'Relief of symptoms of medically diagnosed Irritable Bowel Syndrome'.
However, serious forms of diseases, conditions, ailments or defects that require ongoing supervision by a medical practitioner are restricted representations and cannot be qualified by 'medically diagnosed'. These indications are not suitable for listed medicines that are not assessed pre-market. Indications relating to these conditions are not included in the list of permitted indications. Sponsors wishing to make these indications will need to use a pre-assessment pathway for their medicine (registered or assessed listed).
Issue 5: Requests to remove 'mild' from certain conditions
Industry stakeholders submitted that in many cases, the requirement that certain indications be qualified with 'mild' is unnecessary and potentially confusing for consumers. They felt it would be more informative to consumers if the 'mild' qualifier was removed from a number of indications.
The qualifier 'mild' has been used for certain indications to ensure that listed medicines cannot refer to serious forms of disease or condition. For example, the qualifier 'mild' has been included in 'mild osteoarthritis'.
Where an indication is qualified with 'mild' it is a requirement that this qualifying term is used on the medicine label.
Issue 6: Requests for indications to include conditions of 'moderate' severity
Industry stakeholders submitted that in some circumstances it is appropriate for certain conditions to be qualified with the term 'moderate'. They submitted that referencing more advanced stages of these non-threatening but progressive illnesses are appropriate for low risk medicines.
The TGA maintains that indications referring to 'moderate' conditions are not appropriate for low risk listed medicines.
Sponsors wishing to make these types of indications will need to use a pre-assessment pathway for their medicine (registered or listed assessed).
Issue 7: Sunscreens forced to comply with the latest version of the Australian/New Zealand Sunscreen Standard
When the Australian and New Zealand Sunscreen Standard AS/NZS 2604:2012 came into effect in 2012, sunscreen products listed prior to 2012 could comply with the 1998 Standard (AS/NZS 2604:1998) as long as they did not make any major changes to their product.
Industry stakeholders complained that requiring existing sponsors of sunscreens products to re-list using permitted indications will now force these products to comply with the latest version of the Australian and New Zealand Sunscreen Standard, AS/NZS 2604:2012, even though these products were given an exemption in 2012.
When the 2012 sunscreen standard came into effect, sunscreen products listed prior November 2012 could continue to comply with the 1998 sunscreen standard as a phase out arrangement to avoid major disruption of the supply of sunscreens in Australia. TGA analysis of sunscreen therapeutic products currently in the Register indicates that over 70% of sunscreens should now be compliant with the 2012 sunscreen standard.
Requiring the remaining sunscreen products to comply with the 2012 sunscreen standard from the time they transition to the permitted indications is not unreasonable, given that the new standard has now been in place for 5 years and, the public health importance of sunscreens in Australia. There is a 3 year transition period for listed medicines sponsors to re-list their products using permitted indications and to comply with the 2012 sunscreen standard.
Issue 8: Removal of cellular level indications
There were mixed stakeholder views on the inclusion of cellular level indications (for example: 'For DNA synthesis') in the list of permitted indications.
Some stakeholders argued that these claims are not therapeutic indications, not meaningful to the consumer and should be removed from the list. However, others argued that cellular level indications are required in the list as they help consumers understand how the medicine works.
The TGA sought advice from ACCM on this issue. ACCM advised TGA that 'cellular level indications' that describe a structure, function or mechanism of action are not therapeutic indications and should not be included in the permitted indications list. The Committee noted that there is no therapeutic context for these types of statements and they may not be understandable or provide useful information to consumers.
The TGA accepted ACCM's advice and in general, cellular level indications are not included in the list of permitted indications.
Issue 9: Use of traditional medicine terminology
Consumers raised concerns that the specific terminology used in Ayurvedic and Chinese traditional medicine indications will not be understood by the general consumer.
TCM and Ayurvedic medicine terminology have been included in the list in recognition that traditional terminology is required for persons familiar with these paradigms to use the medicines appropriately.The TGA's approach of including TCM and Ayurvedic medicine specific indications and supporting terminology is consistent with international developments. As part of the its Traditional Medicine Strategy, the World Health Organisation recommends that all member states appropriately include traditional medicine terms in their regulatory, legislative and policy initiatives around traditional and complementary medicine products and practices.
On the issue of traditional terminology not being understood by consumers unfamiliar with the traditional paradigm, ACCM advised the TGA that there should be a label advisory statement to encourage consumers to consult their health practitioner. The TGA accepted ACCM's advice and medicines using Ayurvedic and TCM indications are required to include the following label advisory statement: 'Please seek the advice of a traditional Chinese (or Ayurvedic) medicine practitioner if you are unsure if this medicine is right for you'.
The inclusion of a mandatory label advisory statement is aimed at addressing consumer concerns that TCM and Ayurvedic indications using paradigm specific terminology have the potential to confuse consumers, such as 'Support protective Qi'. These indications use terminology that is not in English and so cannot be understood by average consumers who are not familiar with the paradigm. The advisory is therefore intended to encourage consumers to seek advice from e.g. a TCM practitioner prior to initial/continuous usage.
Other traditional indications that do not use specific terminology (i.e. they are in English) and can be more easily understood by consumers do not require the label advisory statement.
Issue 10: There should be a 'disclaimer' on medicines using traditional indications
Consumers submitted that a mandatory label warning statement (or 'disclaimer') should be enforced for medicines using traditional indications, such as: 'This product's traditional claims are based on alternative health practices that are not accepted by most modern medical experts. There is no good scientific evidence that this product works'.
In responding to the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation, the Government 'supported the intent' of the recommendation for a disclaimer for listed medicines, but will not require sponsors to place a disclaimer on product labels.
The legislative instrument for permitted indications introduces an additional regulatory requirement for medicines including traditional indications on their medicine label. These medicines must now state that the indication is based on traditional evidence and, specify the traditional paradigm e.g. 'Traditionally used in Chinese herbal medicine'.
In addition, medicines using indications with TCM or Ayurvedic specific terminology must include a label statement such as 'Please seek the advice of a traditional Chinese (or Ayurvedic) medicine practitioner if you are unsure if this medicine is right for you'.
Issue 11: Indications should not be included in the list if there is no evidence to support them
Some stakeholders submitted that there is no evidence to support many of the indications included in the draft list.
Complementary medicines encompass a wide range of products, with varying sources of evidence on their efficacy, and a history of use related to cultural and traditional values as well as on the basis of consumer health preferences.
It is not correct to say that there is no evidence to support many proposed permitted indications. Consistent with current arrangements, the permitted indications list includes indications that may be supported by evidence sourced from scientific literature or evidence of traditional use (for example, based on long-term use and experience in a specific traditional paradigm outside modern conventional medicine, such as traditional Chinese medicine).
Consistent with current arrangements, evidence to support the use of permitted indications must be held by product sponsors and this may be requested and assessed by the TGA as part of the TGA's post market compliance program.
Issue 12: Criticism that the list is too long
Some stakeholders submitted that the list should only include a small number of very modest indications. They also submitted that all indications should be qualified with 'May help' to prevent consumers from being misled.
Indications that meet the eligibility criteria for permitted indications have been included in the final proposed list of permitted indications. These criteria are included in our Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance.
The criteria ensure that listed medicines can only make low level indications that are suitable for low risk listed medicines that do not undergo pre market assessment by the TGA. The criteria also ensure that the list of permitted indications is comprehensive and flexible enough to meet the needs of sponsors and consumers.
In general, the word 'may' has not been used in permitted indications as it can imply that the sponsor does not have evidence of sufficient quality to show that their medicine is effective. This is not consistent with the legislative requirement for sponsors to hold evidence for the indications they make for their medicine.
Issue 13: Additional proposed indications
Approximately 3000 additional indications were proposed for inclusion in the list of permitted indications during the open comment period.
We thank individuals and organisations who lodged submissions for their valuable contribution. Your feedback was used in the development of the final permitted indications list which is contained in the Therapeutic Goods (Permissible Indications) Determination. A number of proposed indications met the legislated criteria and these were included in the final. However, a significant majority were not accepted for inclusion.
The Indications proposed by industry during the 2017 public comment period document provides a reason why each indication proposed during the public comment was not included in the final list of permitted indications. It should be noted that for some indications, there may be more than one reason why an indication was not accepted.
A more detailed explanation of these reasons is provided below.
Reasons for non-inclusion of proposed indications in the list of permitted indications
- Indications already included /or indications of similar intent/ or more appropriate indications included in the list of permitted indications
These indications were considered to be covered by indications of similar intent or other indications that are more appropriate for use in listed medicines.
- Issue 2: Biomarker indications
- Issue 3: Indications for pregnancy and foetal development
- Issue 6: Requests for indications to include conditions of 'moderate' severity
Please note that the indications in this category cannot necessarily be used interchangeably with indications included in the Permissible Indications Determination. Sponsors need to ensure that they hold appropriate evidence for all indications that they make for their medicine and that indications they include on the product label have the same intent and meaning as the indications they enter in the Register.
For more information please see the following sections of the Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance:
- Using permitted indications on medicine labels and advertising
- Indications that did not meet the definition of a therapeutic indication
These indications do not describe a specific therapeutic use' for a medicine (as defined in section 3 of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989).
- Structure/function claims that do not describe a therapeutic use (e.g. 'X is a component of bone').
- The proposed indication did not contain the necessary components of an indication (e.g. it did not have an acceptable therapeutic action or target).
- Cosmetic claims, such as 'Decrease split ends'
Note that in most cases more appropriate indications describing a therapeutic use are available in the list of permitted indications, for example:
- 'Maintain/support bone strength' may be an more appropriate alternative to 'X is a component of bone'
- 'Improve hair health' may be an appropriate alternative to 'Decrease split ends' which appears to be a cosmetic claim.
For more information please see the following sections of the Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance:
- Does your product make therapeutic indications, cosmetic or food claims?
- Product statements and claims that are not indications
- Indications not compliant with the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code
These indications were not accepted because they are unlikely to be compliant with the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code when used on medicine labels and other advertising material. For example, this includes indications that:
- are likely to be misleading to consumers because they are not scientifically plausible. To not be considered misleading, the indication must be able to be supported by currently available scientific knowledge or a documented tradition of use
- imply that harm may result from not using the medication, e.g. 'Prevent falls in the elderly' or 'May reduce/ decrease the risk of low birth weight'
- Indications referring to or implying a treatment or prevention
These indications were not accepted because they refer to or imply the prevention, cure or alleviation of any disease, ailment, defect or injury and do not comply with the eligibility criteria for a low-level permitted indication. Therapeutic actions relating to treatment, prevention, alleviation, cure and management have a definitive meaning and are not suitable for permitted indications as they may lead consumers to delay seeking medical treatment.
Please see the Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance for more information.
- Indications containing or implying a serious disease/restricted representation
These indications were not accepted because they contain or imply a restricted representation and do not comply with the eligibility criteria for a low-level permitted indication. A restricted representation is a 'serious form' of a disease, condition, ailment or defect specified in the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code. All indications that refer to a restricted representation require assessment and approval through a pre-market assessment pathway.
- Indications not compliant with the Sunscreen Standard
These indications do not comply with the 2012 Australian and New Zealand Sunscreen Standard AS/NZS 2604:2012 Sunscreen products—Evaluation and classification (refer to the Australian Regulatory Guidelines for Sunscreens) have not been included in the list, for example: 'SPF 10 Moderate protection sunscreen'.
- Indications where the health benefit is unclear
These indications were worded in such a way that the health benefit was unclear, e.g. 'Helps support allergy symptoms'; 'Aids / assists / supports occurrence of intestinal gas'; 'Help regulate / control / balance / normalise / maintain premature ageing'.
The publication of the Indications proposed by industry during the 2017 public comment period document finalises the TGA consultation process to develop and implement the list of permitted indications.
Notices of planned future updates to the Permissible Indications Determination will be published on the Regulatory decisions & notices (complementary medicines) page.
Sponsors who want to use an indication that is not currently approved for use in listed medicines, can apply for new indications to be added to the list of permitted indications using the 'Indication and Qualifier application' form via the TGA Business Services website. An application fee applies. Information about the application process is available in the Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance document.
Sponsors may apply (using the 'Indication and Qualifier application' form) for indications considered in the Indications proposed by industry during the 2017 public comment to be reconsidered by the TGA, however it is expected that they provide a detailed justification for the context of an indication’s use to address the reason why the indication was not included in the Permissible Indications Determination.
Files for download
Indications proposed by industry
Permitted indications for listed medicines guidance
Permitted indications fact sheets
- Terminology used in permitted indications fact sheet
- How to use the list of permitted indications fact sheet
- Criteria for permitted indications fact sheet
Draft list of permitted indications - CLOSED
Draft lists of evidence qualifiers - CLOSED
- Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Phone: 1800 020 653 (free call within Australia) or +61 2 6232 8634