Skip to main content

Site notifications

Cancellations and suspensions

This database records details of medicines and medical devices that have been cancelled or suspended, and no longer appear in the ARTG.

Following a review by the TGA, complementary medicines can be cancelled from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. These cancellations are made by the Secretary under section 30 of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.

Where other actions are taken in relation to safety, a link to the TGA's safety alert will be included in the database under 'Further information'.

The reasons for a cancellation are stated in the database below under 'Grounds for cancellation'.

The heading 'Decision status' provides updated information about cancellation decisions, for example information about any decision to revoke a cancellation decision. It will not appear in every entry.

To find out whether a product is currently authorised for supply in Australia, check the ARTG.

Last updated

Find out more about Cancellations and Suspensions.

Search

263 result(s) found, displaying 251 to 263
  • Regulatory action due to The goods are not eligible for listing as the indication was for the treatment of a condition specified in Part 2 of Appendix 6 to the TGAC (see item 3, Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations). The sponsor has failed to comply with a condition of listing under s28(5)(ab) (that the goods would not advertise the goods for an indication other than those accepted in the Register)., effective 14/06/2013
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect.The goods do not conform to a requirement relating to advertising applicable to the goods under Part 5-1 of the Act., effective 17/05/2013
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect. The goods do not conform to a requirement relating to advertising applicable to the goods under Part 5-1 of the Act., effective 08/05/2013
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect., effective 04/04/2013
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect (paragraph 30(2)(ba)). The goods also did not conform to regulatory requirements relating to advertising (paragraph 30(2)(e)., effective 25/02/2013
  • Regulatory action due to Sponsor failed to comply with notice under section 31 of the Act requiring it to provide information about whether the product should have been listed., effective 04/01/2013
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect. Failed to comply with a condition of listing under s.28(5)(ab) of the Act., effective 11/12/2012
  • Regulatory action due to As the medicine is now required to be included in another part of the Register under ss.10B(1)(a) and ss.10B(7)(b)(i), the medicine has became ineligible for listing s.30(1A)(a) of the Act., effective 23/11/2012
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect., effective 09/10/2012
  • Regulatory action due to As there was insufficient evidence to support the indications for the product and the presentation of the product was unacceptable, the certifications made by the applicant under s.26A(2)(c) and (j) were incorrect., effective 15/08/2012
Last updated