

| Version | Description of change | Author | Effective date |
|---|---|---|---|
| V1.0 | Original Publication | Office of Corporate Services/ Office of Medicines Authorisation | 1 July 2013 |
© Commonwealth of Australia 2013
This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce the whole or part of this work in unaltered form for your own personal use or, if you are part of an organisation, for internal use within your organisation, but only if you or your organisation do not use the reproduction for any commercial purpose and retain this copyright notice and all disclaimer notices as part of that reproduction. Apart from rights to use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 or allowed by this copyright notice, all other rights are reserved and you are not allowed to reproduce the whole or any part of this work in any way (electronic or otherwise) without first being given specific written permission from the Commonwealth to do so. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights are to be sent to the TGA Copyright Officer, Therapeutic Goods Administration, PO Box 100, Woden ACT 2606 or emailed to <tga.copyright@tga.gov.au>.
The purpose of this Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS) is to document cost recovery arrangements that the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) will apply to activities associated with the registration or listing of over the counter medicines onto the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) and the ongoing monitoring and surveillance of over the counter medicines registered or listed on the ARTG.
This CRIS will apply from July 2013 to June 2014.
The TGA forms a part of the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA), responsible for evaluating the safety, quality and efficacy of medicines, medical devices and blood components available for supply in, or export from Australia. The TGA recovers the full costs of its regulatory activities through fees and charges imposed on sponsors and manufacturers of therapeutic products.
The Australian community has an expectation that therapeutic products in the marketplace are safe and of high quality, to a level equal to that of countries with comparable standards.
All over the counter medicines imported into, supplied for use in, or exported from Australia must be registered or listed on the ARTG.
Australia has a risk based system where the level of regulatory control of a therapeutic product is based on the relative safety of the product and the seriousness of the condition for which it is intended to be used. Products are reviewed by the TGA at a level consistent with the risk associated with their use in the community.
In December 2002, the Australian Government adopted a formal cost recovery policy to improve the consistency, transparency and accountability of its cost recovery arrangements and promote the efficient allocation of resources. The underlying principle of the policy is that agencies set charges to recover all the costs of a product or service where it is efficient and effective to do so, where the beneficiaries are a narrow and identifiable group and where charging is consistent with the Australian Government policy objectives. Cost recovery policy is administered by the Department of Finance and Deregulation and outlined in the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines (Cost Recovery Guidelines).
The policy applies to all Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) agencies and to relevant Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (CAC Act) bodies that have been notified. In line with the policy, individual portfolio ministers are ultimately responsible for ensuring entities' implementation and compliance with the Cost Recovery Guidelines.
The TGA has been progressively increasing the level of cost recovery from industry since 1992-93. In the 1997-98 Budget, the Government agreed that the TGA would accelerate the rate of increase in the level of cost recovery from industry to 100 percent cost recovery of all its activities by 1998-991. Government has not changed this decision in subsequent years. This policy authority encompasses recovering expenses incurred by the TGA in the regulation of therapeutic medicines manufacture.
As part of the 2012-13 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook2, the Government agreed that the cost of the TGA reform program, detailed in the report TGA reforms: a blueprint for TGA's future3, should be recovered from the regulated industry through the existing arrangements. This measure has resulted in a small increase to the fees and charges over the period 2012-13 to 2015-16.
The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (the Act) provides a legal authority for the TGA to charge for its regulatory activities within the scope of the Act on a cost recovery basis. Applicable fees and charges are prescribed in the TG Regulations made under the Act and the Therapeutic Goods (Charges) Act 1989 (the Charges Act). These regulations are Therapeutic Goods (Charges) Regulations 1990 and the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990.
Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are defined in the Therapeutic Goods Regulations 1990 (the 'Regulations'). OTC medicines can be supplied as:
Medicines are grouped into schedules according to the appropriate level of regulatory control over their availability to consumers. OTC medicines can be purchased for self-treatment from pharmacies, with selected products also available in supermarkets, health food stores and other retailers. Examples include cough and cold remedies, anti-fungal treatments, sunscreens, non-prescription analgesics such as aspirin and paracetamol.
OTC medicines can be registered or listed on the ARTG depending on the level of risk associated with making the product available and accessible to consumers. The distinction between registered and listed OTC medicines is made based on the sponsor's claims around the efficacy of the product.
Registered OTC medicines are considered to be of lower risk than prescription medicines, but they require an appropriate level of scrutiny. When making the decision to register an OTC medicine, the TGA takes into account all of the advice given by the scientific and medical experts and the advice given to it by the Advisory Committee on Non-prescription Medicines, along with the information provided by the sponsor.
Once a product has been registered, the sponsor can make further applications to change the conditions of registration. Changes may be sought for the following:
The pre-market regulatory process for OTC medicines includes application processing, evaluation and listing or registration. Key steps in the process include:
The OTC post market regulatory processes include detection, compliance and enforcement.
The TGA has commenced work on a series of reforms to the regulation of OTC medicines. These reforms are based on tightening the risk based approach with more rigorous pre-application requirements and standardisation of response times. Depending on the risk classification of a registered OTC, evaluation effort would range from minimal (e.g. monographs) for products with a long history of safe use, to full assessment of quality, safety and efficacy for new active combinations.
The reforms are part of the TGA reforms: a blueprint for TGA's future and aim to:
The TGA estimates demand for its services based on prior years' volumes which are adjusted for forecast changes in the industry operations and changes in the regulatory framework and/or service delivery models.
Estimates for the number of products on the register incorporate expected cancellations and new additions.
A sponsor can seek exemption from the liability to pay an annual charge for an entry on the ARTG if the therapeutic good qualifies for low value turnover (LVT), which is a turnover of not more than 15 times the applicable annual charge for that therapeutic good.
| 2012-13 | 2013-14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Registered over the counter medicines | 3,301 | 3,404 |
Fees and charges are established to cover the cost of all direct, corporate and support costs for the sector. The costing methodology allows costs to be allocated to activities based on their resource consumption at each stage of the process through to the final product or services.
Total costs are categorised into the following groups for cost allocation and transparency purposes.
Cost allocation is undertaken in a three stage process.
In the first stage, the regulatory offices with significant contribution to the sector, as the source of direct costs, are identified. For the OTC medicines sector, these are the Office of Medicines Authorisation; the Office of Scientific Evaluation, the Office of Product Review and the Office of Laboratory and Scientific Services.
In the second stage, corporate costs are allocated to all offices, both regulatory and support, based on the driver that best reflects the use of the corporate service. For example, rent and other property operating costs are allocated using floor space; information technology and communications are allocated by FTE.
In the third stage, support costs are assigned to regulatory offices based on a driver that is related to the services provided by the support team. For example, the property team costs are allocated by the floor space driver, the human resources team are allocated by FTE.
| 2012-13 Estimated outcome $m |
2013-14 Forecast $m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Direct Costs | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| Corporate Costs | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Support Costs | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Total | 3.7 | 3.9 |
| 2012-13 Estimated outcome $m |
2013-14 Forecast $m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Direct Costs | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| Corporate Costs | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Support Costs | 3.0 | 3.1 |
| Total | 6.9 | 7.2 |
TGA recovers the full cost of its regulatory activities through fees and charges for services provided to product manufacturers and sponsors.
Fees are used to recover the cost of the premarket services performed. The current fee structure in the Regulations is based on an application fee and evaluation fee. The evaluation fee differs for new registered medicines, variations and new substances. The total page numbers in the application document is the current basis for setting the evaluation fees. In the new fee structure that is expected to apply from July 2014 the use of page numbers as the basis for fees would be discontinued.
Annual charges are payable for OTCs that are registered or listed on the ARTG. Registered OTCs, that have a higher assessed risk, have a higher annual charge than listed OTCs.
Annual charges are used to recover cost of activities, usually post market, where:
For the 2013-14 financial year, fees and charges were indexed by 2.9% which is a 50:50 composite of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Consumer Price index and the Wage Price Index (for the September Quarter 2011 to September Quarter 2012).
All fees and charges include a component for the cost of the reform program, which was introduced through a 2% increase in fees and charges from 2012-13. The implementation of the reform program is scheduled to continue through to mid 2015-16. As changes in regulatory activities are implemented, fees and charges will be adjusted to ensure that they continue to accurately reflect the costs of underlying activities.
| Registration of OTC Medicines | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|---|---|---|
| Application fee | 1,370 | 1,410 |
| Additional / concurrent application fee | 600 | 620 |
| Processing fee (variation to an existing registration) | 1,370 | 1,410 |
| Annual Charge | 1,280 | 1,320 |
| Listing of OTC medicines - Including sunscreens | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|---|---|---|
| Application fee | 720 | 740 |
| Processing fee (variation to an existing listing) | 360 | 370 |
| Annual Charge | 910 | 940 |
| Evaluation Fees if the documentation does not contain Clinical or Toxicological data - per submission | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|---|---|---|
| New registered medicine | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| Variation | 3,310 | 3,410 |
| New substance: such as sunscreen excipients and complementary medicine substances | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| Evaluation Fees based on total page count(s) of Clinical or Toxicological data per submission | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| New Product | 1 - 50 | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| 51 - 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 - 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 - 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 - 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 - 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| Variations | 1 - 50 | 3,310 | 3,410 |
| 51 - 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 - 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 - 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 - 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 - 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| New Substance | 1 - 50 | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| 51 - 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 - 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 - 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 - 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 - 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| Multiple New Excipients in listed or registered good for dermal use | 1 - 50 | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| 51 - 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 - 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 - 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 - 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 - 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| Assessment of Safety and Efficacy | 1 - 50 | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| 51 - 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 - 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 - 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 - 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 - 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| Evaluation Fees based on total page count(s) of Clinical or Toxicological data per submission | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| New Listable Medicine Substance | 1 – 50 | 9,170 | 9,440 |
| 51 – 250 | 11,800 | 12,100 | |
| 251 – 500 | 16,100 | 16,600 | |
| 501 – 1000 | 21,400 | 22,000 | |
| 1001 – 2000 | 32,100 | 33,000 | |
| 2001 – 3000 | 42,800 | 44,000 | |
| > 3000 | 64,100 | 66,000 | |
| Assessment of safety information or documents submitted pursuant to Section 31 of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 | 6,980 | 7,180 | |
| Listed medicines—Export only | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|---|---|---|
| Application fee | 720 | 740 |
| Processing fee (variation to an existing listing) | 360 | 370 |
| Listed medicines-Export certificates | 2012-13 $ |
2013-14 $ |
|---|---|---|
| Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product | 140 | 150 |
| Certificate of Listed Product | 140 | 150 |
| Certificate of Exempt Product | 140 | 150 |
Total revenues are a factor of the expected activity volume and the fee or charge4.
| 2012-13 Estimated outcome $m |
2013-14 Forecast $m |
|
|---|---|---|
| Annual Charges | 2.7 | 2.8 |
| Application Fees | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| Evaluation Fees | 2.7 | 2.0 |
| Other4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Total | 7.1 | 6.6 |
A regular mechanism used by industry stakeholders to monitor the TGA's activities and performance is the TGA Industry Consultative Committee (TICC). The TICC meets twice yearly to examine progress against key projects, agreed targets and financial performance. TGA also consults with industry associations separately on regulatory matters and cost impacts relating to specific sectors. Industry associations are also consulted in the process of regulatory development and reform, and feedback is taken into account in developing regulatory impact statements, and in developing cost recovery arrangements. Meetings are held with key industry representative bodies each year to discuss financial forecasts and as a part of the consultation process on cost recovery.
Cost recovery revenue is reported in the Department of Health and Ageing's Annual Report in accordance with the Finance Minister's Orders.
The TGA executive is provided with monthly financial reports showing progress against the monthly budgets and an analysis of financial performance and position undertaken by the TGA Chief Financial Officer.
TGA prepares a half yearly performance report detailing statistical information on regulatory workflows. The report is distributed to the TICC members.
TGA is reviewing its ABC methodology to ensure that the fees and charges cover the costs of the services provided. Overall, fees and charges must cover the cost of the regulatory costs for the sector.
A business review of regulation of OTC medicines is being implemented, part of which includes evaluation processes based on the product risk. Higher risk products will attract greater scrutiny before registration on the ARTG, and evaluation fees will be set accordingly.
TGA aims to have updated OTC evaluation fees implemented by the end of the 2013-14 financial year. The updated fees and charges will be documented in a new CRIS.
I certify that this CRIS complies with the Australian Government Cost Recovery Guidelines
Secretary
Department of Health and Ageing
Date: 12 June 2013