Notifications process: requests to vary registered medicines where quality, safety and efficacy are not affected

Version 1.0, June 2017

Book pagination

3 July 2017

Notifications for prescription medicines (non-biological)

Registered non-prescription medicines: This guidance came into effect on 1 July 2017.

Prescription medicines: This guidance is for information only and will come into effect on 1 January 2018.

This guidance outlines the variations to non-biological (chemical) prescription medicines that are considered as requests made under the provisions of section 9D(2C) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (known as notifications). Conditions that are outlined below the description of each variation type must be met for the request to be processed as a notification.

Open all | Close all
If you want to print all conditions, you need to Open all before you print.

Categories:

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) changes

ACCS: API container - changes to container/closure system of a non-sterile API

Changes to the container or closure system used to store a non-sterile API.

  • The API must not be sterile.
  • The material of the container/closure must be either unchanged or changed to a more protective material.
  • The thickness of the material must be either unchanged or increased.
  • There must be no change in retest period/storage conditions, or a decrease in retest period and/or more stringent storage conditions in the new container/closure system.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new container/closure system.
  • Details of the new retest period or storage conditions, if changed.

You must generate the following:

  • Relevant comparative moisture permeability data for the current and proposed material demonstrating either equivalent or better moisture protection.
  • Initial stability testing data of the API in the new container/closure system conducted in accordance with relevant stability testing guidelines.

ACEP: API Certificate of Suitability (CEP) - A revision for a non-sterile API that is not a synthetic polypeptide or prepared by fermentation

This covers all changes to the data package of the API that have been reviewed by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and Healthcare (EDQM) where the EDQM subsequently issued a revised Certificate of Suitability (CEP), or have declared that a revised CEP is not required.

  • The API must not be manufactured wholly or substantially by fermentation.
  • The API must not be a synthetic polypeptide.
  • The API must not be manufactured as a sterile drug substance.
  • The current CEP must have been approved previously by the TGA.
  • The revised CEP must be the next issued version from that approved by the TGA. Additional consecutive updates can be included if:
    • the changes are minor, covering a change to the CEP or manufacturer only and/or
    • where the drug substance has not been used to manufacture any drug products supplied in Australia.
  • Where changes to the API specification are involved (including test parameters, limits and test methods), the same changes must be adopted by the product sponsor and/or drug product manufacturer, and any new test methods must be validated as suitable for use.
  • Where a change to the site of API manufacture is involved, the site must have either:
    • a licence to manufacture the API (if the site is in Australia) or
    • sponsor-specific GMP clearance (if the site is overseas) that is valid at the time of the application.

You must submit:

  • Documentary evidence that the current CEP has been previously approved by the TGA.
  • The updated CEP, including any annexes, or a declaration from the EDQM that, due to the nature of the changes, an updated CEP was not issued.
  • A summary of the changes made to the API that resulted in the revision of the CEP.
  • A declaration that any test requirements in addition to those in the CEP that were previously approved by the TGA will continue to apply.
  • A declaration that no significant changes to the API have been made since the revised CEP was issued. If minor changes have been made, a flow diagram or outline of the revised route of synthesis of the API must also be submitted.
  • The revised API specification, including test methods, adopted by the API manufacturer and the drug product manufacturer/product sponsor (as relevant).

A GMP clearance or manufacturing licence is not required for the manufacturing site of intermediates or the site of milling/micronisation of the final drug substance. If, however, the milling of the final API occurs in Australia the site will require a GMP licence.

If a manufacturing site for an intermediate is included in the CEP, please make this clear to avoid confusion about the actual site of manufacture of the API.

You must generate the following data:

  • Relevant comparative data for pre-change and post-change batches of the API (if the revision to the CEP is due to changes to the method of synthesis that involve using different crystallisation solvents, a different purification process, or micronisation of the final drug substance).
  • Comparative data using validated test methods to show that:
    • there is no change in the crystalline (polymorphic) form of the final substance (if relevant) and
    • the particle size distribution profiles (tested by a laser diffraction or other equivalent method) remain comparable and within the same ranges as the pre-change API. Alternatively comparative dissolution profiles must be generated.
  • Comparative batch data from at least one production-scale batch of the final drug substance manufactured or tested according to the changed process, and should demonstrate compliance with any revised API specification. If there is a justifiable reason for not using production-scale batches, three pilot-scale batches may be used.

AMBS: API and intermediate manufacture - change to batch size of a non-sterile API (existing site)

Change to the size of a manufacturing batch of a non-sterile API or its intermediates.

  • Any increase in batch size must be less than 10 fold.
  • There must be no change in route of synthesis (including solvents used in the final purification of the API), other than any necessary adjustment to processing conditions or use of different equipment.
  • The change must not be due to unexpected events arising during manufacture or to stability concerns.
  • The API must not be a sterile substance.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new size of manufacturing batches.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data demonstrating there is no significant difference in the tested parameters, particularly particle size distribution and impurity profiles.

AMCS: API site of manufacture - cessation

Cessation of an approved site for the manufacture of the API.

  • There must be at least one registered site of manufacture for the API.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the manufacturer to be ceased.
  • A current TGA Business Services printout for the product or a copy of the TGA approval showing that at least one registered site of manufacture of the API remains to perform the relevant steps of manufacture.

AMIT: API and intermediate manufacture - addition, revision or deletion of in-process control tests and limits

Addition, revision or deletion of in-process control tests and associated limits applied during manufacture of the API or its intermediates.

  • The change must be consistent with any applicable principles of the Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products.
  • The change must not be due to adverse events during manufacture.
  • The change must result in equivalent or improved quality of the final isolated material.
  • The specifications of the API and intermediates may only be changed in ways permitted in other parts of this guidance document or remain unchanged.
  • The new test method must not be a biological method.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new in-process control tests and limits.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the in-process control test method.
  • Batch analytical data from testing of three batches using the current and proposed methods demonstrating the results are within the same ranges.

AMMC: API and intermediate manufacture - minor manufacturing changes not involving sterilising steps (existing site)

Minor changes to the manufacture of the API or its intermediates (i.e. equipment or process changes to improve efficiency), excluding changes to sterilising steps.

  • The change must be consistent with any applicable principles of the Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products.
  • The synthetic route must remain the same, and no new reagents, solvents or catalysts are to be used in the amended process.
  • The change must not involve any sterilising steps.
  • The specifications of the API and intermediates may only be changed in ways permitted in other parts of this document or remain unchanged.

You must submit:

  • Details of the amended manufacturing process, including the synthesis flowchart.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data for the API or intermediate/s demonstrating there are no significant differences in the purity profiles or physicochemical properties.

AMMF: API starting material/intermediate site of manufacture - change to/addition of (for APIs manufactured by multi-step syntheses or fermentation)

Transfer to, or addition of, an alternative site for the manufacture of intermediates for APIs that are manufactured by multi-step synthesis, which may include intermediates prepared wholly or partially by fermentation.

  • The intermediates must be isolated chemical species and be at least three steps back in the synthetic scheme from the API (purification procedures do not count as steps of synthesis).
  • There must be no change in the overall synthetic route of the API, starting materials or intermediates.
  • The specification limits of starting materials or intermediates must be the same or tighter.
  • For intermediates prepared wholly or partially by fermentation:
    • there must be either no change in the strain of the producer organism used or, where there is a change, details of the new producer organism must be provided and the component profiles of the final fermentation broth at harvest made from the new and old strain must be the same.
    • there must be no changes to the scale of operation of the fermentation tank and fermentation processes.
    • there must be no changes to the nature of the media ingredients, particularly precursors, activators or components of biological or animal origin (although changes to the quantities used are acceptable, provided that they are not a result of a change in scale of operation).

You must submit:

  • The name and site address of the new manufacturer(s) of the starting material(s) or intermediate(s). GMP evidence is not required, as the new site is not entered in the ARTG and the product sponsor or purchaser of the intermediates is responsible for supplier qualification.
  • The route of synthesis of the API.
  • The name or code number of the intermediates for which the alternative site of manufacture is sought.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data (including impurity levels) for the starting material(s) or intermediate(s) manufactured at the current and proposed sites using validated test methods.
  • Comparative batch data for API synthesised using starting material(s) or intermediate(s) from the current and proposed sites demonstrating that there are no significant differences in purity profiles.

AMTA: API site of manufacture - transfer of/addition to an existing manufacturer's site of a non-sterile API that is not prepared by fermentation

Transfer to, or addition of, an alternative site of manufacture of non-sterile APIs that are not prepared by fermentation, but by chemical synthesis or through isolation from a natural source as pure chemical entities.

  • The API must be prepared by chemical synthesis or isolated from a natural source as pure chemical entities.
  • The API must not be prepared wholly or partially by fermentation, and must not be sterile.
  • There must be no change to the existing method of synthesis, including to any intermediates and any solvents used in the purification of the final drug substance (the API), or any other aspect of manufacture and specifications.

This change only applies where the sponsor of the drug product or the new API manufacturer knows the full route of synthesis and all other details of manufacture of the API at both sites.

  • The manufacturing batch size remains unchanged or smaller.
  • The new site must have either:
    • a current manufacturing licence issued by the TGA for this type of manufacture (if the site is in Australia) or
    • the drug product sponsor must have current GMP clearance issued by the TGA for this type of manufacture (if the site is overseas).

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturing site.
  • The flowchart of the route of synthesis from the existing site and the new site of manufacture.
  • The manufacturing batch size at the new site.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data for three batches of the API from the proposed site. This data must demonstrate that all results (including impurity profiles, particle size distribution and polymorphic forms) are either:
    • within the same range as three batches manufactured at the current site (that is, no new impurities or polymorphic forms are present) or
    • remain unchanged.

ASAM: API/starting material/intermediate specifications - changes to non-biological test methods for assay and/or residual solvents (including water)

Changes to a non-biological method used for assaying or residual solvent testing (including testing for water where this may be present) of the API, starting materials for API synthesis or intermediates created in the synthetic process.

  • The proposed method must not be a biological method.
  • Validation data from the proposed method must demonstrate either:
    • an improvement in at least one of precision, accuracy or specificity, without a reduction in the other parameters or
    • an improvement in specificity or accuracy with reduced precision (while precision remains within the specified limits).

You must submit:

  • Details of the proposed method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Validation data for the proposed method.
  • Data for three batches of the API tested using the current and proposed methods demonstrating equivalency of both methods.

ASDR: API re-test period and storage conditions - decrease to re-test period and/or more restrictive storage conditions

Decrease in the re-test period, or application of more restrictive storage conditions, for APIs.

  • The change should not be the result of unexpected events arising during manufacture or because of stability concerns.

You must submit:

  • Reasons for the change.
  • Details of the new shelf life and/or storage conditions.
  • An assurance that you possess adequate stability data for at least three production-scale batches of the product to support the new shelf life and/or storage conditions.

ASID: API/starting material/intermediate specifications - changes to identification tests

Changes to identification tests used for the API, starting materials for API synthesis or intermediates created in the synthetic process.

  • The changes to identification tests must:
    • be from a less specific to a more specific identification test (for example, from an ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometric or chromatographic method, such as thin layer chromatography, gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), to a conventional infrared spectroscopic method) and/or
    • vary the existing identification test (for example, an HPLC test that has been shown to improve or at least maintain the specificity of the method) and/or
    • replace an existing identification test with a near infrared spectroscopic identification test and/or
    • include a new identification test in addition to an existing identification test.
  • Any additional identification test must not serve as an alternative identification test.
  • For near infrared spectroscopy tests, the method development and other data requirements (including data collection, establishment of the spectral reference library, calibration and validation of the method) must comply with the currently adopted European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on the use of near-infrared spectroscopy.

You must submit:

  • The revised set of specifications.
  • Details of the identification test method.

ASNL: API/starting material/intermediate specifications - narrowing of limits

Any revision of the specifications for testing of the API, starting materials for API synthesis or intermediates created in the synthetic process must make the limits applied to the test results more stringent.

  • The proposed limits must be consistent with any applicable official standard or adopted guidelines.
  • The grade of material must not change (for example, unmicronised to micronised material).

You must submit:

  • The revised set of specifications for the starting materials, intermediates or API (as applicable).

You must generate the following data:

  • Data for at least three production-scale batches demonstrating compliance with the proposed limits.

ASNT: API/starting material/intermediate specifications - addition of new test and limit

Addition of a new test and associated limits to the approved specifications for the API, starting materials for API synthesis or intermediates created in the synthetic process.

  • The change must not result from an altered method of manufacture that changes the material's quality characteristics (such as micronisation).
  • The proposed method must be validated.
  • Applied limits must be based on batch analytical data, and comply with any applicable official standard or adopted guidelines.
  • The change must not involve a genotoxic impurity.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new method.
  • The revised set of specifications for the starting materials, intermediates or API (as applicable).

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data for at least three commercial batches demonstrating compliance with the proposed test and limit.

ASPT: API specifications - amendments resulting from pharmacopoeial or TGO changes

Changes to the specifications for the API as a result of amendments to requirements in a default standard (i.e. a monograph in the British pharmacopoeia [BP], The United States Pharmacopeia and The National Formulary [USP-NF] or the European Pharmacopoeia [EP]) or relevant requirements in an applicable standard made by the Minister under section 10 of the Act.

  • The API must already be tested to the existing pharmacopoeial or TGO requirements.
  • The requirements applied from one pharmacopoeia must not be changed to another (e.g. changing from the BP to the USP requires the submission of data for evaluation).
  • The new pharmacopoeial monograph or amended TGO must be applicable to the API.
  • Any tests that were performed in addition to those of the pharmacopoeial monograph should continue to be applied, except where the test was removed going from the old monograph to the new one.

You must submit:

  • The revised set of specifications for the API.

Drug product manufacture changes - method, batch size or equipment

DMBS: Drug product manufacture - changes to batch size for products that are not modified release dosage forms

Changes to the size of the manufacturing batch of drug products, where these are not modified release dosage forms or sterile products.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new manufacturing batch size, with the revised batch manufacturing formula, and any revised manufacturing process and flow diagram, if relevant.

You must generate the following data:

DMEL: Drug product manufacture - changes to manufacturing method and/or equipment of semi-solid/liquid dosage forms that are not modified release

Changes to methods or equipment used in the manufacture of semi-solid or liquid products, where these are not modified release dosage forms and are not sterile.

You must submit:

  • Details of the revised method of manufacture and/or equipment, and any relevant flow diagram of the new process.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data that demonstrates all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • Comparative batch data using appropriate methodology demonstrating that there has been no change to the particle size distribution and polymorphic form of the API in suspension.
  • These data are not required if the API is in solution for the drug product, or if it is in solution as liquid globules.

DMEO: Drug product manufacture - changes to manufacturing method and/or equipment of oral/nasal inhalation dosage forms that are not modified release

Changes to methods or equipment used in the manufacture of oral or nasal inhalation products, where these are not modified release dosage forms and are not sterile.

You must submit:

  • Details of the revised method of manufacture and/or equipment, and any relevant flow diagram of the new process.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data that demonstrates all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • For metered-dose pressurised inhalations, metered-dose nasal spray solutions, and dry powders for oral or nasal inhalation, the comparative batch data for the drug mass aerodynamic particle size distribution of the aerosol emitted by the drug product must demonstrate that results are in the same range as previously obtained, as measured by either a multi-stage liquid impinger or a multi-stage cascade impactor (Andersen type).
  • These data are not required if the API is in solution at any stage during manufacture of the drug product, or if it is in solution in the drug product or present as liquid globules.

DMES: Drug product manufacture - changes to manufacturing method and/or equipment for solid dosage forms that are not modified release

Changes to the manufacturing method or equipment used in the manufacture of solid dosage forms that are not modified release and are not sterile.

  • The product must not be a modified-release dosage form. This includes enteric-coated tablets, enteric capsules and transdermal patches.
  • The new manufacturing method and equipment must be validated consistent with any applicable principles of the Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products on at least one production-scale batch of the product.

You must submit:

  • Details of the revised method of manufacture and/or equipment, and any relevant flow diagram of the new process.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data that demonstrates all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • All solid dosage forms (for example, tablets, capsules, compressed suppositories and pessaries) must have similar comparative dissolution profiles - that is, the similarity factor, f2, should be between 50 and 100. These data are not required if the API is in solution at any later stage during manufacture of the drug product, or if it is in solution in the drug product or present as liquid globules.

DMIT: Drug product manufacture - changes to in-process control tests and limits

Addition, revision or deletion of in-process control tests and associated limits applied during manufacture of the drug product.

  • The change must not relate to the parametric release of sterile products.
  • The change must be consistent with any applicable principles of the Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products.
  • Any changes to in-process control test methods must be validated appropriately.
  • The change must result in either improved quality or no change in the quality of the drug product.

You must submit:

  • Details of the changes proposed, and the revised set of in-process control tests and limits. Test method details are not required.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data with the results within the same range as previously obtained.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

DMRO: Drug product manufacture - reduction or removal of API and excipient overages for ingredients that are not antioxidants or similar

Reduction or removal of previously approved manufacturing overages for APIs or excipients, where the excipients may be preservatives but are not antioxidants and where the final drug product is not a modified release dosage form.

Since overages do not change the nominal quantity recorded in the ARTG, this type of change is not regarded as a change in the product formulation.

  • Any excipient involved must not be an antioxidant or another ingredient whose function (at least in part) involves being 'consumed' over time.
  • Manufacture of the product with reduced overage must be validated.
  • The TGA must be notified as a priority if the results of supporting stability data fail to meet the specifications. The TGA reserves the right to withdraw the product from the market if this requirement is not met.

You must submit:

  • The revised manufacturing formula.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data to demonstrate that the results are comparable to those obtained previously (allowing for the reduction in overage).

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • Stability data on at least one production batch of the post-variation product (with at least two more production batches to be similarly tested) should have been initiated.

DMSE: Drug product manufacture - changes to manufacturing method and/or equipment of sterile dosage forms that are not modified release

Changes to methods or equipment used in the manufacture of sterile dosage forms, where these are not modified release dosage forms.

  • The product must not be a modified-release dosage form.
  • The new manufacturing method and equipment must be validated consistent with any applicable principles of the Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products on at least one production-scale batch of the product.
  • Other changes to ensure sterility are permitted, provided that:
    • the technology to be used already exists at the manufacturing site and is in use for other TGA-approved products.
    • there are no changes to (or there are improvements in) microbiological environmental standards, bioburden specifications, the sterilisation cycle or its parameters, and sterility assurance levels.

You must submit:

  • Details of the revised method of manufacture and/or equipment, and any relevant flow diagram of the new process.
  • Validated process times.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data that demonstrates all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • The new method of manufacture (including sterilisation of containers or container components, and use of a second filter in a filling line) or new manufacturing equipment (such as introduction of a similar filling line) must not affect the final sterility of the product.
  • All of the following dosage-specific conditions should be certified as having been met, as appropriate:
    • For semi-solid and liquid products (for example, ointments, creams, lotions, oral liquids, moulded suppositories and pessaries eye drop suspensions comparative batch data using appropriate methodology should demonstrate that there has been no change to the particle size distribution and polymorphic form of the API in suspension. These data are not required if the API is in solution.
    • For metered-dose pressurised inhalations, metered-dose nasal spray solutions, and dry powders for oral or nasal inhalation, the comparative batch data for the drug mass aerodynamic particle size distribution of the aerosol emitted by the drug product should be in the same range as previously measured by either a multi-stage liquid impinger or a multi-stage cascade impactor (Andersen type). These data are not required if the API is in solution at any stage during manufacture of the drug product.

Site of manufacture changes

DMDM: Drug product site of manufacture - cessation of a site or deletion of a manufacturing step

Cessation of, or deletion of a step in, the manufacture of the drug product at an approved site.

  • This change is applicable to all medicines, including sterile products and modified-release dosage forms.
  • There must be at least one other site that performs the same steps of manufacture as the ceased site, or that performs the deleted step of manufacture.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the manufacturer to be ceased.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) to be deleted, as relevant.
  • Documentary evidence to show that there is at least one registered site of manufacture performing the same step of manufacture as the ceased site.

DMPL: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site of labelling/primary packaging (non-sterile products) or labelling/secondary packaging

Change to the location of a manufacturer, or addition of a new manufacturer, approved for labelling and primary packaging operations for non-sterile dosage forms or labelling and secondary packaging operations for all dosage forms.

  • A change in, or addition of an alternative, site of primary packaging operations may relate to any product except products that are sterile or are manufactured under sterile conditions.
  • A change in, or addition of an alternative, site of secondary packaging operations may relate to any product, including sterile products and products manufactured under sterile conditions.
  • The new site must have either:
    • a current Australian manufacturing licence for this type of manufacture or
    • if an overseas manufacturer is proposed, the drug product sponsor must have current GMP clearance (valid at the time of the application) for the new manufacturing site and for that type of manufacture.
  • Apart from the change in site of manufacture, there must be no change to any aspect of the quality data other than changes to manufacturing equipment.
    • Where a change in manufacturing equipment is made, this must be validated in accordance with the principles of GMP.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturer.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) undertaken at the new site of manufacture.

DMSL: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site of manufacture of non-sterile semi-solid/liquid dosage forms that are not modified release

Change to the location of an approved manufacturer, or addition of a new manufacturer, to make the final drug product, where the products are non-sterile, semi-solid or liquid dosage forms that are not modified release.

  • Applies to sites of manufacture of the final drug product only, not sites performing in-process steps.
  • The product must not be sterile or manufactured under sterile conditions.
  • The product must not be a modified-release dosage form. This includes enteric-coated tablets, enteric capsules and transdermal patches.
  • The new site must either have:
    • a current manufacturing licence issued by the TGA (Australian manufacturers) for this type of manufacture or
    • current GMP clearance issued by the TGA and valid at the time of this application (overseas manufacturers) for this type of manufacture.
  • There must be no changes to any aspect of the quality data other than changes to manufacturing equipment or method at the new site of manufacture and
    • The changes to the manufacturing methods are only those necessitated by scale-up or downscaling, e.g. use of different-sized equipment or
    • The change does not adversely affect the reproducibility of the process and it is not the result of unexpected events arising during manufacture or because of stability concerns.
    • Where a change in manufacturing equipment or method is made, this must have been validated at the new manufacturing site in accordance with the principles of GMP and/or any relevant guidelines adopted by the TGA.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturer.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) undertaken at the new site of manufacture.
  • A summary of the change in manufacturing equipment or manufacturing method at the new site, if relevant.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data demonstrating all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • For semi-solid and liquid products (for example, ointments, creams, lotions, oral liquids, moulded suppositories and pessaries), comparative batch data using appropriate methodology demonstrating that there has been no change to the particle size distribution and polymorphic form of the API in suspension. These data are not required if the API is in solution at any stage during manufacture of the drug product, or if it is in solution in the drug product or present as liquid globules.

DMSO: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site of manufacture of non-sterile oral/nasal inhalation dosage forms that are not modified release

Change to the location of an approved manufacturer, or addition of a new manufacturer, to make the final drug product, where the products are non-sterile oral or nasal inhalation dosage forms that are not modified release.

  • Applies to sites of manufacture of the final drug product only, not sites performing in-process steps.
  • The product must not be sterile or manufactured under sterile conditions.
  • The product must not be a modified-release dosage form.
  • The new site must either have:
    • a current manufacturing licence issued by the TGA (Australian manufacturers) for this type of manufacture or
    • current GMP clearance issued by the TGA and valid at the time of this application (overseas manufacturers) for this type of manufacture.
  • There must be no changes to any aspect of the quality data other than changes to manufacturing equipment or method at the new site of manufacture.
    • Where a change in manufacturing equipment or method is made, this must have been validated at the new manufacturing site in accordance with the principles of GMP and/or any relevant guidelines adopted by the TGA.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturer.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) undertaken at the new site of manufacture.
  • A summary of the change in manufacturing equipment or manufacturing method at the new site, if relevant.
  • A declaration that the changes to the manufacturing methods are only those necessitated by scaling-up or down, e.g. use of different-sized equipment, that the change does not adversely affect the reproducibility of the process, that it is not the result of unexpected events arising during manufacture or because of stability concerns.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data demonstrating all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • For metered-dose pressurised inhalations, metered-dose nasal spray solutions, and dry powders for oral or nasal inhalation, the comparative batch data for the drug mass aerodynamic particle size distribution of the aerosol emitted by the drug product demonstrating that results are in the same range as previously obtained, as measured by either a multi-stage liquid impinger or a multi-stage cascade impactor (Andersen type).

DMSS: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site of manufacture of non-sterile solid dosage forms that are not modified release

Change to the site of an approved manufacturer, or addition of a new manufacturer, to make the final drug product, where the products are non-sterile solid dosage forms that are not modified release.

  • Applies to sites of manufacture of the final drug product only, not sites performing in-process steps.
  • The product must not be sterile or manufactured under sterile conditions.
  • The product must not be a modified-release dosage form. This includes enteric-coated tablets, enteric capsules and transdermal patches.
  • The new site must either have:
    • a current manufacturing licence issued by the TGA (Australian manufacturers) for this type of manufacture or
    • current GMP clearance issued by the TGA and valid at the time of this application (overseas manufacturers) for this type of manufacture.
  • There must be no changes to any aspect of the quality data other than changes to manufacturing equipment or method at the new site of manufacture as outlined under Site of manufacture changes.
    • Where a change in manufacturing equipment or method is made, this must have been validated at the new manufacturing site in accordance with the principles of GMP and/or any relevant guidelines adopted by the TGA.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturer.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) undertaken at the new site of manufacture.
  • A summary of the change in manufacturing equipment or manufacturing method at the new site, if relevant.
  • A declaration that the changes to the manufacturing methods are only those necessitated by scaling-up or down, e.g. use of different-sized equipment, that the change does not adversely affect the reproducibility of the process, that it is not the result of unexpected events arising during manufacture or because of stability concerns.

You must generate the following data:

  • Comparative batch data demonstrating all results are comparable and within the same range as those obtained previously, as well as meeting currently approved drug product release specifications.

For this type of change, the use of retention samples to compare the last three batches manufactured under previous conditions is only allowed in exceptional circumstances, which should be justified by the sponsor.

  • All solid dosage forms (for example, tablets, capsules, compressed suppositories and pessaries) must have similar comparative dissolution profiles - that is, the similarity factor, f2, should be between 50 and 100. These data are not required if the API is in solution at any stage during manufacture of the drug product, or if it is in solution in the drug product or present as liquid globules.

DMTR: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site performing testing and release for supply

Change to the location of a manufacturer, or addition of a new manufacturer, approved for quality control testing (including sterility, microbiological, chemical, physical and bacterial endotoxin or pyrogen testing) or release for supply of the final drug product.

  • The change applies to sites of manufacture of the final drug product only, not sites performing in-process steps.
  • This change is applicable to all medicines, including sterile products and modified-release dosage forms.
  • The new site must either have:
    • a current manufacturing licence issued by the TGA (Australian manufacturers) for this type of manufacture or
    • current GMP clearance issued by the TGA and valid at the time of this application (overseas manufacturers) for this type of manufacture.
  • There may not be any changes to the existing test methods used for testing the product, whether or not the test methods have been provided to the TGA previously, except where allowed by DMSL: Drug product site of manufacture - change to site of manufacture of non-sterile semi-solid/liquid dosage forms that are not modified release.

You must submit:

  • The name and address of the new manufacturer.
  • Details of the manufacturing step(s) undertaken at the new site of manufacture.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate technology transfer of the approved test methods to the proposed site must have been carried out.

Drug product specifications or test changes

Certified product details (CPD) documents

An updated CPD document is usually provided when a change is made to aspects of the drug product specifications, such as test requirements, limits of acceptance or non-pharmacopoeial test methods.

If any of the notification requests below result in changes to the product specifications or the non-pharmacopoeial test methods, please provide an updated and complete CPD document in PDF format using the CPD form available on the TGA website.

DSAM: Drug product specification - changes to non-biological assay method for an active or excipient that is not a radiopharmaceutical

Changes to a non-biological method used for assaying the API or excipients in a final drug product that is not a radiopharmaceutical.

  • The product must not be a radiopharmaceutical.
  • If the results obtained using the proposed method do not agree with the results obtained using an official method, the results from the official method will be deemed to be correct.
  • The proposed method must not be a biological method.
  • The proposed method must not be a test method for impurities, related substances or degradation products.
  • Validation data from the proposed method must demonstrate either:
    • an improvement in at least one of precision, accuracy or specificity, without a reduction in the other parameters or
    • an improvement in specificity or accuracy with reduced precision (whilst precision remains within the specified limits).

You must submit:

  • Details of the proposed test method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the proposed method.

DSID: Drug product specification - changes to identification tests for the active or excipient

Changes to the tests used to identify the API or excipients in the final drug product.

  • The changes to identification tests must:
    • be from a less specific to a more specific identification test (for example, from an ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometric or chromatographic method, such as thin layer chromatography, gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), to a conventional infrared spectroscopic method) and/or
    • vary the existing identification test (for example, an HPLC test that demonstrably improves or at least maintains the specificity of the method) and/or
    • replace an existing identification test with a near infrared spectroscopic identification test and/or
    • include a new identification test in addition to an existing identification test.
  • The method must be appropriately validated.
  • Any additional identification test included cannot serve as an alternative identification test (this should be submitted as a Category 3 application).
  • If near-infrared spectroscopy is used, the method development and other data requirements (including data collection, establishment of the spectral reference library, calibration and validation of the method) must comply with the current EMA guideline on use of near-infrared spectroscopy that has been adopted by the TGA.

You must submit:

  • Details of the changes to the existing test or the new identification test.
  • The revised set of drug product specifications at release and expiry.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the identification test.

DSIP: Drug product specification - changes from an in-house test method to a pharmacopoeial test method

Changes to the specifications to ensure that the drug product complies with the requirements of a default standard (i.e. a monograph in the BP, USP-NF or EP), where previously no default standard applied.

  • Any changes can be made to assay and/or related substances test methods, but not to a dissolution method which requires TGA evaluation of supporting data.
  • The method must be appropriately validated.

You must submit:

  • A summary description of the change and details of the new method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Equivalency of the current and pharmacopoeial test method must be established by testing of three batches of the drug product using the current and proposed methods.

DSNL: Drug product specification - narrowing of test limits

Revision of the approved specifications for testing of the final drug product, to make the limits applied to test results more stringent.

You must submit:

  • A statement of the current and proposed limits.
  • The revised set of drug product specifications at release and expiry.

DSNT: Drug product specification - addition of test and limit

Addition of a new test and associated limits to the approved specifications for the final drug product.

  • The proposed method must be validated.
  • The proposed limit (release and expiry) of the new test must be based on batch data obtained at product release and on storage for the duration of the shelf life of the product. The limit must comply with any applicable official standard or adopted guidelines.

You must submit:

  • A statement of the new test and limit.
  • The revised set of product specifications at release and expiry.
  • Details of the test method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the test method.

DSPL: Drug product specification - minor changes to physicochemical test methods and limits

Minor changes to methods used to test physicochemical parameters of the final drug product.

Physicochemical parameters include pH, hardness, friability, colour, particle size distribution, particulate matter contamination, density, specific gravity, optical rotation, extractable volume, osmolality, osmolarity and viscosity.

  • The test limit should either remain unchanged or be more stringent.
  • The amended method should have been validated.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new method together with a summary description of the change.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the new method.

DSPT: Drug product specification - changes resulting from pharmacopoeial or TGO requirements

Changes to the specifications for the final drug product as a result of amendments to requirements in a default standard (i.e. a monograph in the BP, USP-NF or EP) or relevant requirements in an applicable standard made by the Minister under section 10 of the Act.

  • The products must currently be tested to the existing pharmacopoeial or Therapeutic Goods Order (TGO) requirements.
  • Any tests that are performed in addition to those of the pharmacopoeial monograph or TGO must continue to be performed.
  • The requirements applied from one pharmacopoeia must not be changed to another, except where the changes are allowed by other sections of this document (e.g. changing from USP to BP is not permitted as a notification).
  • The new pharmacopoeial monograph or amended TGO must be applicable to the product and, if necessary, appropriate validation data must be generated.
  • If the change involves updating microbiological test requirements for non-sterile products to meet the TGO for microbiological standards for medicines, the product must have undergone a risk assessment for objectionable microorganisms in addition to those specified in the pharmacopoeias that form the basis of the TGO.

You must submit:

  • The revised set of drug product specifications (release and expiry), if applicable.
  • If the change relates to an update to meet the requirements of the TGO for microbiological standards for medicines, a written assurance that the TGA can review the risk assessment report for objectionable microorganisms other than those specified in the order, if required.

You must generate:

  • Appropriate validation data, as required.

DSST: Drug product specification - changes to sterility test method

Changes to the sterility test methods used for the final drug product.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new method together with a summary description of the change.

Changes to excipients

EMRS: Excipient manufacture (from Category IC ruminant tissues) - changes in source (from animal to non-animal) and/or manufacturing process or site

Changes to the source, manufacturing process or site of manufacture of excipients derived from Category IC ruminant tissues (including from animal to plant or non-animal source).

  • The product must only be intended for oral, topical, vaginal, rectal or inhalation routes, with no potential for cross-contamination with higher risk (Category A or B) tissues.
  • The product must not be administered by the parenteral, ophthalmic or intra-tracheal routes.
  • The change must be from a ruminant-derived source to a plant or other non-animal source.
  • No changes to the specifications of the excipients are permitted, except for the changes allowed within the Changes to excipients section.

You must submit:

  • Details of the excipients and the proposed changes.
  • Where relevant, CEP issued by the EDQM to the manufacturer of the excipient.
  • A declaration that the Category IC material has been self-assessed and complies with the TGA's requirements regarding Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSE) risks.
  • An assurance that records of compliance will be maintained for future inspection by the TGA.
  • The revised specifications, if changes have been made.

ESAM: Excipient specification - change to assay method

Changes to a method used for assaying an excipient.

  • The proposed method must either:
    • improve at least one of precision, accuracy or specificity without a reduction in the other parameters or
    • the proposed method must improve accuracy or specificity with reduced precision if precision remains within the specified limits.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new assay method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the proposed method.

ESIP: Excipient specification - change from an in-house to a pharmacopoeial test method

Changes to the specifications to ensure that the excipient complies with the requirements of a default standard (i.e. a monograph in the BP, USP-NF or EP), where previously no default standard applied.

  • Change or addition must only be to test methods for physicochemical parameters (e.g. pH, colour, particle size, particulate matter, density, specific gravity, optical rotation, osmolality, osmolarity and viscosity).
  • The change must not result from an altered method of manufacture that changes the material's quality characteristics (such as micronisation).
  • Applied limits must be based on batch analytical data, and comply with any applicable official standard (TGO or default standard) or adopted guidelines.
  • Any tests that are performed in addition to those of the pharmacopoeial monograph or TGO for critical parameters (e.g. particle size, pH, viscosity) must continue to be performed.

You must submit:

  • The revised set of specifications for the excipient.
  • A summary description of the change and details of the new method.

You must generate the following data:

  • Validation data for the method(s), as required.
  • Equivalency of the current and pharmacopoeial test method(s) must be established by testing of three batches using the current and proposed methods.

ESNL: Excipient specification - narrowing of limits

Revision of the approved specifications for testing of excipients, to make the limits applied to test results more stringent.

  • The proposed limits must be consistent with any applicable official standard (TGO or default standard) or adopted guidelines.

You must submit:

  • A statement of the current and proposed limits.
  • The revised set of specifications for the excipient.

ESNT: Excipient specification - new test and limit

Addition of a new test and associated limits to the approved specifications for an excipient.

  • The change must not result from an altered method of manufacture that changes the material's quality characteristics (such as micronisation).
  • Applied limits must be based on batch analytical data, and comply with any applicable official standard (TGO or default standard) or adopted guidelines.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new test and limit, including the test method.
  • The revised set of specifications for the excipient.

You must generate the following data:

  • Appropriate validation data for the proposed method.

ESPT: Excipient specification - changes resulting from pharmacopoeial or TGO requirements

Changes to the specifications for an excipient as a result of amendments to requirements in a default standard (i.e. monograph in BP, USP-NF or EP) or relevant requirements in an applicable standard made by the Minister under section 10 of the Act.

  • The excipient must be tested to the existing pharmacopoeial or TGO requirements.
  • Any tests that are performed in addition to those of the pharmacopoeial monograph or TGO must continue to be performed.
  • The new pharmacopoeial monograph or TGO must be applicable to the product and the excipient.

You must submit:

  • Details of the proposed change.
  • The revised set of specifications for the excipient.

Changes to container/closure system

CCCA: Container/closure - change to components

Changes to outer packaging or components of the container that are not in direct contact with the drug product.

For sterile products, the container components that are being changed are not required to be sterile.

  • The change may be:
    • a change to, or addition or removal of, the outer carton or other outer primary pack (including changes to size, shape, colour or material thickness) and/or
    • a change to, or addition or removal of, components of the container that are not in direct contact with the product (for example, tamper-evident seal, aluminium flip-off crimps on injection vials, plastic dust-cover disc/top/cap) and/or
    • the inclusion or removal of inert wadding from bottles and other containers containing solid dosage forms; and/or
    • the inclusion of a desiccant in containers of solid dosage forms and/or
    • the inclusion of, or change to, an outer overwrap designed to prevent ingress or egress of moisture, solvent or gases from a container (including changes to size, shape or colour, or increased material thickness).
  • Other than inert wadding and desiccant, the components must not be in direct contact with the product.
  • The label of any outer carton or other primary pack that is added or changed must either remain unchanged, be identical to the container label or be changed as permitted under:
  • Where an existing carton or primary pack is removed, the container label must either remain unchanged or be changed as permitted under:
  • No change can be made to the product's shelf life or storage conditions as a notification. For self-assessable (SAR) changes to the shelf life or storage conditions see:
    • DSLE: Shelf life - Extension according to an approved stability-testing protocol and
    • DSLD: Shelf life - Decrease and/or more restrictive storage conditions.
  • The TGA must be notified as a priority if the results of supporting stability data fail to meet the specifications. The product in the new container system may be withdrawn from the market at the TGA's discretion.

You must submit:

  • Details of the change(s).
  • Where a desiccant is included in a container, an assurance that the desiccant is used to improve the existing acceptable stability profile of the product and is not used to overcome stability problems in the existing container.
  • Where a desiccant is included in a container, information on the nature of the desiccant, as well as information showing that the desiccant is readily distinguishable from the product, and is appropriately labelled and identified as a desiccant.
  • If an overwrap is introduced, the rationale for its inclusion, and details of the material of the overwrap and specification.

You must generate the following data:

  • Where applicable, comparative data to demonstrate the removal of inert wadding has not adversely affected the product's friability and other physical attributes during normal transport.
  • If an overwrap is introduced or changed, a stability study of the product with the overwrap to verify the product shelf life must have been initiated on at least one production-scale batch of the product, and should begin on the second and third batches as they are manufactured.

CCSS: Container/closure - change to size and shape for non-sterile dosage forms

Changes to the size and shape of the container or closure system used for drug products that are non-sterile dosage forms.

  • The change must not result in a change to the container type.
  • If the container is a blister pack or strip pack, the change in size or shape must not result in an increase in the headspace volume of the blister-pack or strip-pack pocket.
  • If the container is a reclosable package, there must not be an increase in the headspace of the container.
  • The material and thickness of the container/closure system must be either unchanged or changed in a manner permitted under change types:
  • No change can be made to the product's shelf life or storage conditions as a notification. For self-assessable (SAR) changes to the shelf life or storage conditions see:
    • DSLE: Shelf life - Extension according to an approved stability-testing protocol and
    • DSLD: Shelf life - Decrease and/or more restrictive storage conditions
  • No change can be made to the quantity of products in the new container/closure system.
  • The TGA must be notified as a priority if the results of supporting stability data fail to meet the specifications. The product in the new container system may be withdrawn from the market at the TGA's discretion.

You must submit:

  • Details of the new container/closure system, with specifications, if relevant.
  • If the closure is a child-resistant cap, or implied by its presentation and construction to be one, a declaration that the reclosable package meets all of the requirements of the current TGO on child-resistant packaging. The declaration must state, in particular, which of the recognised international standards on child-resistant packaging the closure complies with, and include evidence of adequate directions for opening and reclosing the package.

You must generate the following data:

  • If the container is a reclosable package and is child-resistant (or is implied by its presentation to be a child-resistant package), data must have been generated to demonstrate that the child-resistant properties of the package and operation of the closure have not been adversely affected by the change in size and shape.
  • For solid oral dosage forms, comparative moisture permeability (water-vapour transmission) data must have been generated on the new and current container systems using the current edition of the USP test for containers—permeation (multi-unit or single-unit containers, as appropriate), and the results must show either equivalent or better moisture protection.
  • A stability study using the new container/closure system to verify the product shelf life must have been initiated on at least one production-scale batch of the product (with at least two more production batches to be similarly tested).

CCST: Container/closure - changes to specification and test methods

Changes to the specifications for the container or closure system of the final drug product, to include new tests, make specified limits more stringent, delete a test procedure or make minor changes to test methods.

You must submit:

  • Updated specifications and test methods.

You must generate the following data:

  • Validation data for the proposed method demonstrating that the updated test procedure is at least equivalent to the former test procedure.

CMDT: Container/closure material - decrease in thickness for blister packs, strip packs and sachets for non-sterile solid or semi-solid dosage forms

Decrease in the thickness of aluminium foil, or laminate material used in laminated aluminium foil, for blister packs, strip packs and sachets containing non-sterile solid or semi-solid drug products.

  • The product must be a non-sterile dosage form.
  • The material that is decreased in thickness must be either the aluminium foil or, in the case of a laminated aluminium foil, the aluminium foil itself or any non-aluminium polymeric material laminated to it.
  • The new aluminium foil thickness or the aluminium component of the laminated foil must be at least 20 µm.
  • The container/closure material must be unchanged.
  • No change should be made to the product's shelf life or storage conditions. See self-assessable changes to the shelf life or storage conditions.
  • The TGA must be notified as a priority if the results of supporting stability data fail to meet the specifications. The product in the new container system may be withdrawn from the market at the TGA's discretion.

You must submit:

  • Details of the change in thickness of the container material, with specifications, if relevant.

You must generate the following data:

  • Initial stability study data using the new container/closure system to verify the product shelf life must have been initiated on at least one production-scale batch of the product (with at least two more production batches to be similarly tested).

CMIT: Container/closure material - increase in thickness for non-sterile solid, semi-solid, semi-liquid or liquid dosage forms

Increase in the thickness of the material used for the container or closure system of non-sterile solid, semi-solid, semi-liquid or liquid drug products.

  • The container/closure material must be unchanged.
  • No change can be made to the product's shelf life or storage conditions as a notification. For self-assessable (SAR) changes to the shelf life or storage conditions see:
    • DSLE: Shelf life - Extension according to an approved stability-testing protocol and
    • DSLD: Shelf life - Decrease and/or more restrictive storage conditions.
  • The TGA must be notified as a priority if the results of supporting stability data fail to meet the specifications. The product in the new container system may be withdrawn from the market at the TGA's discretion.

You must submit:

  • Details of the change in thickness of the container/closure material, with specifications, if relevant.

You must generate the following data:

  • A stability study using the new container/closure system to verify the product shelf life must have been initiated on at least one production-scale batch of the product (with at least two more production batches to be similarly tested).

Product label changes

Requirements for labels

Mandatory labelling requirements for prescription medicines are set out in the Therapeutic Goods Order (TGO) that pertains to labels, as amended from time to time. It is the sponsor's responsibility to ensure that their product labels meet any state and territory government requirements.

LQAE: Label - addition of excipients

Inclusion of the names of excipients on the medicine label, regardless of whether the substances must be declared on a label to comply with a Ministerial standard.

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final or mock-up of the amended labels which include any logos, design work or graphics are provided. The copy must be to scale and must indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple strengths and/or pack sizes, one representative label or copy will be sufficient provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength.

LQAT: Label - amendment of expression of API content in topical preparations as previously approved

Amendment to the expression of the proportion of active ingredient in a topical preparation.

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final copies or mock-ups of the amended labels, including any logos, designs or graphics. The copy should preferably be of actual size and should indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple pack sizes or strengths, one representative label or copy will be sufficient, provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength, unless this would contravene the strength differentiation requirement.

LQHI: Label - addition of 'hypotonic', 'hypertonic' and 'isotonic' for large-volume injections

Addition of the terms hypotonic, hypertonic and isotonic on the labels of large-volume injections.

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final copies or mock-ups of the amended labels, including any logos, designs or graphics. The copy should preferably be of actual size and should indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple pack sizes or strengths, one representative label or copy will be sufficient, provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength, unless this would contravene the strength differentiation requirement.

LQRT: Label - addition of a previously approved release rate for transdermal patches

Addition of an approved release rate on the label of medicines that are transdermal patches.

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final copies or mock-ups of the amended labels, including any logos, designs or graphics. The copy should preferably be of actual size and should indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple pack sizes or strengths, one representative label or copy will be sufficient, provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength, unless this would contravene the strength differentiation requirement.
  • For changes to labels resulting from other regulatory actions that have been either already notified or approved, appropriate evidence of the notification or approval (such as a TGA submission number).

LWAH: Label - addition of a warning or cautionary statement where an incorrect route for method of administration is hazardous

Addition of a warning or cautionary statement to a medicine label, to indicate that an incorrect route or method of administration may be hazardous (e.g. 'Not for injection', 'For external use only' and 'Not for oral use').

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final copies or mock-ups of the amended labels, including any logos, designs or graphics. The copy should preferably be of actual size and should indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple pack sizes or strengths, one representative label or copy will be sufficient, provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength, unless this would contravene the strength differentiation requirement.

LWSR: Label - changes to/addition of a warning or precaution statement resulting from an approved safety-related variation to the PI

Change to, or addition of, a warning or cautionary statement on the medicine label, resulting from or relating to a safety-related variation to the entry in the Register for the product made by the Secretary under subsection 9D(2) of the Act, and an associated variation to the Product Information for the product made by the Secretary under subsection 25AA(4) of the Act.

  • All changes to the label must be identified in the request.
  • The changes must ensure continued compliance with the relevant TGO pertaining to labels.

You must submit:

  • Copies of the existing labels and final copies or mock-ups of the amended labels, including any logos, designs or graphics. The copy should preferably be of actual size and should indicate the colours to be used.
    • If there are multiple pack sizes or strengths, one representative label or copy will be sufficient, provided that the only difference between the labels is the pack size or strength, unless this would contravene the strength differentiation requirement.
  • For changes to labels resulting from other regulatory actions that have been either already notified or approved, appropriate evidence of the notification or approval (such as a TGA submission number).

Book pagination